Mike Ozekhome LP
Mike Ozekhome LP
Get In Touch
All Articles
Legal News/Views

NAIRA SWAP: Why Buhari can’t overrule Supreme Court order – Ozekhome

MO
Mike Ozekhome
Senior Partner · February 18, 2023 · 4 min read
NAIRA SWAP: Why Buhari can’t overrule Supreme Court order – Ozekhome

February 17, 2023

PROF. MIKE A.A. OZEKHOME, SAN, CON, OFR,  Ph.D.

Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mike Ozekhome has justified why President Muhammadu Buhari can not overrule the Supreme Court order on the new naira policy.

According to him, it is wrong for the President to disobey the Supreme Court order on the old naira notes.

Recall that the apex court had in an interim order restrained the Federal Government from suspending the acceptance of the old naira notes.

But, Ozekhome, in a statement on Friday, described the order by the President as a ‘dicta, more in the form of a military Decree’.

The statement partly reads, “Buhari, in his broadcast on Thursday, February 16, 2023, unilaterally varied the apex court’s extant order of maintenance of status quo, by directing the CBN Governor to the effect that ‘the old N200 banknotes be released back into circulation…to circulate as legal tender with the new N200, N500 and N1000 bank notes for 60 days…’

“This order is a clear violation of and disobedience to the existing order of the apex court which had already maintained the status quo ante bellum of all parties involved in the Naira re-design dispute.

“The Supreme Court had on Wednesday, February 15, 2023, after the first interim order, adjourned the suit originally filed by the Attorneys-General of Kano, Kogi and Zamfara states (other interested parties were later joined) to February 22, to enable it hear the entire matter holistically.”

Ozekhome added that Nigerians expected the president to obey the law, adding that by the disobedience of Buhari, he had exhibited the trait of an Emperor and Overlord.

He said, “Every Nigerian had expected that the Federal Government would respect this apex court’s position. But President Buhari demurred. He made himself Supreme Leader; an Emperor; Potentate, Mikado and Overlord.

“Buhari’s broadcast to the nation therefore literally overruled the Supreme Court of the land, in a way and manner only a military tyrant could ever contemplate.

“Buhari’s action is a reminder of the apocryphal saying of autocratic and despotic Emperor Louis XIV, who, on 13th April, 1655, stood in front of Parliament and imperiously declared, ‘L’Etat C’est Moi (I am the State)”. This was to underline the fact that he and he alone, had absolute power over his Nation.’”

Ozekhome said apart from being a direct assault on the apex court, Buhari’s order could lead to chaos and anarchy.

He said, “Buhari’s imperious order was a frontal call to chaos, anarchy and national upheaval. It was a direct assault on the authority of the Supreme Court, the highest court of the land; and also the head of the entire Judiciary, the 3rd arm of government under the doctrine of separation of powers, most ably popularized in 1748 by Baron de Montesque, a great French Philosopher.

“To have whimsically and capriciously varied the order of the Supreme Court was to pick and choose what order to obey or disobey. This breaches the supremacy of the 1999 Constitution provided for in section 1(1) thereof. It also frontally assaults the provisions of section 287(1) of the Constitution which provides that ‘the decisions of the Supreme Court shall be enforced in any part of the Federation by all authorities and persons, and by courts with subordinate jurisdiction to that of the Supreme Court.’”

Making allusion to the Supreme Court, in the case of ABACHA V. FAWEHINMI (2000) 6 NWLR (Pt. 660) 228 at page 317 E-F, he noted, “’A court order must be obeyed and even if it is a nullity, it has to be set aside on appeal against it. Per NWALI SYLVESTER NGWUTA, JSC (Pp 25 – 25 Paras D – E). See also the locus classicus of GOVERNOR OF LAGOS STATE VS. OJUKWU (1986) 1 NWLR PT. 18, PG. 621.”

Ozekhome advised the Supreme Court not to allow this slide, since the President in his speech alluded that the matter was before the apex court.

He said, “This is one instance where the apex court should bare its teeth and bite. This is more so because President Buhari had himself acknowledged in his speech, the pendency of the matter before the Supreme Court. Surely, no one is above the law; not even President Buhari himself.”

MO
Mike Ozekhome
Senior Partner
Felicia AI Assistant

Felicia — AI Legal Assistant

Online · Mike Ozekhome LP

Felicia AI Assistant

Hello! I'm Felicia, the AI legal assistant for Mike Ozekhome LP. It's a pleasure to have you here.

May I know your name before we begin?

Not legal advice · Consult a lawyer for your matter

Book Consultation →

Hi there, how may I assist you today?